Memoryhole Discussion

(Follow up session to the Workshop at 2nd OpenPGP Email Summit, Dec 2015)

complex structures signalling acceptance alternate interpretations?

Proposal: discuss state of implementations and problems we've been having.

Actions

further discussion will happen on openpgp-email@enigmail.net

Agreements

Session

meskio:

stefan:

Patrick:

dkg:

Dominik:

Meskio:

Patrick:

Meskio:

dkg:

Meskio:

dkg:

Patrick:

dkg:

Agreed rules to bubble headers

Multi wrapping example

Arrows mark where can be headers

Only the last two will be taken into account.

Force display versioning

Agreement:

UX about different security levels per header

What about headers with different protections? Should they be replacing the external headers? Should only headers with the same protection as the body be taken into account?

Only the ones with the same protection than de body are taken into account.

How do you represent the different levels of security of each header? Should be a binary thing where the headers are encrypted it's secured only if the headers are stripped or stubbed?

What about a warning sign for each header that is not protected?

Specific headers

OpenPGPEmailSummit201607/MemoryHole (last edited 2016-07-14 13:38:15 by meskio)