IncreaseWKDUsage2021 bachelor thesis

Christoph Klassen is writing his bachelor thesis (at Intevation) about how usage of WKD can be furthered. Bernhard Reiter does the mentoring, see gnupg-devel@ for discussion and for contacting Christoph or Bernhard.

Started at 2021-10

Goal

WKD is easy to implement and brings the advantage of good usability. Because of that it is desirable to spread it and increase its usage. The question is how to do that and which is the best way. More concrete: Which measures fit best to spread the WKD standard. This measures are taken from the area of software engineering and include documentation, testing and implementation. They will be applied to different products that are Free Software.

Difficulty

It is necessary to evaluate the success of different measures to tell which one was the most effective one. It is not possible to track users while using their products, because one main promise of the products is to protect users privacy. So there have to be other ways to measure the success. One idea is to log the WKD calls on a server, which has much traffic. Please contact Bernhard or Christoph when you have these possibilities or know someone who could do this service. It would be very helpful!
This idea would help to evaluate the success of all measures overall. Additionally, it would be of great value, if there would be a way to differentiate between the measures. Maybe the statistics could show a correlation between measures and increase of WKD calls.

Use Cases

It is necessary to define use cases, so it is easier to speak about where to implement a WKD call. These use cases were written by using Cockburns template [1].

Use Case #1: Write an encrypted email

Goal: Write and send an encrypted email
Precondition:

Success: An encrypted email was sent
Failure:

Actors: A random person
Trigger: A person wants to write an encrypted message to another person
Description:

  1. Person opens the email-client
  2. Person opens the window to compose an email
  3. Person enters address, subject and message
  4. Person sends the email

Extensions:

  1. Person checks, if the email really can be encrypted, before she/he tries to send it
  2. Person checks, if the pubkey is trustworthy
  3. Person checks, how trustworthy the pubkey is
  4. Person checks, if the email will be signed

Use Case #2: Read an encrypted email

Goal: Open an encrypted email to read its content
Precondition:

Success: The encrypted email could be read
Failure: The encrypted email could not be read
Actors: A random person
Trigger: A person receives an encrypted email and wants to read it
Description:

  1. Person opens the email-client
  2. Person opens received emails
  3. Person sees that she/he got an encrypted email
  4. Person opens the encrypted email

Extensions:

  1. Person checks, if the email was signed with a valid signature
  2. Person checks, if the pubkey, which was used to encrypt the received email, is trustworthy
  3. Person checks, how trustworthy the pubkey is, which was used to encrypt the received email

Criterions to evaluate the state of products (Draft)

To evaluate how far the progress of different products in terms of WKD is, the questions in the list below will be answered. If the answer is positive a product gets the amount of points that is shown in brackets. The maximal possible amount of points is 12.

Another way to evaluate products is to do a heuristic evaluation. Jakob Nielson created ten different heuristics to examine the usability of products. On [2] is a recent article, where he summarizes the heuristics. The essence of these heuristics is that users want to be able to predict the softwares behavior and to have the feeling of control about the software. Therefore it is necessary that the application gives users enough information to know, what is going on. On the other hand users shouldn't be overwhelmed with to much information or too many choices and UI elements. It is also important that a software is consistent in itself and with other applications, which the users also use, so they can re-use their experience.

State of products and progress

Here it will be described what state different products had at the beginning of the work and what measures were taken to increase the usage of WKD.

Mailvelope

Previous state (analyzed version 4.4.1)

Measures

Claws Mail

Previous state (analyzed version 3.18.0)

Measures

FairEmail/ K9Mail

Previous state

FairEmail

Previous state (analyzed version 1.1776)

Measures

K9Mail

Previous state (analyzed version 5.806)

coming soon

Sources

[1] H. Balzert, Lehrbuch der Softwaretechnik: Basiskonzepte und Requirements Engineering, 3. Edition, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg: 2009
[2] J. Nielsen, 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/

WKD/BachelorThesisIncreaseWKDUsage2021 (last edited 2021-12-06 14:22:06 by Christoph Klassen)