|
Size: 1719
Comment: Section that links the wishlist
|
Size: 1361
Comment: Put a removal / update of claws on the roadmap. Schedule 2.1 for a 3.0 series and move it to "End of 2015"
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
| == 2.2.3 (bugfix release) Very likely in November 2014. |
== For each release * Update of third party libraries. * Update of gnupg and libraries. |
| Line 7: | Line 8: |
| * Fix gpa and claws on XP, glib defect, rand_so * Fix makeportable [[http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpg4win.git;a=commit;h=619481b224a9704195c456db74073599d01eac0f|commit]] * Fix -vanilla packaging to include gnutls * Update assuan and libgcrypt as intended with 2.2.2 |
== 2.2.6 (? probably merged into a 3.0 release) * Remove or Update Claws. |
| Line 12: | Line 11: |
| == 2.2.4 * update of third party libraries * update of gnupg version and libraries * (Claws will not be updated, because overall time pressure and lack of help with it.) == next normal release? maybe 2.3.0 or 3.0.0 (Not scheduled yet, may depend on available funding). Mid 2015? === GnuPG 2.1 integration |
== 3.0.0 (Not scheduled yet, may depend on available funding. End 2015?) * GnuPG 2.1 integration * Kleopatra based on KDE Framework 5? |
(For Developers, work in progress)
Potential Roadmap-Planning
For each release
- Update of third party libraries.
- Update of gnupg and libraries.
2.2.6 (? probably merged into a 3.0 release)
- Remove or Update Claws.
3.0.0 (Not scheduled yet, may depend on available funding. End 2015?)
- GnuPG 2.1 integration
- Kleopatra based on KDE Framework 5?
Refactoring Kleopatra
See KleopatraHackability.
Shall we remove Claws-Mail from the installer?
Rationale: Claws-Mail maintains its own installer for windows, which often is more current. Supporting it by building in into the Gpg4win 2.0.0 installer was a success, this helped the initiative to get a windows installer and it spread the word.
It makes Gpg4win easier to maintain, if we decouple the installers. There is less work to be done, especially less quality control and even some space is safed.
This raises is a more general question: Shouldn't we consider to make the engine (GnuPG and the core libraries) a separate package which can be updated on its own and other packages may install it on the fly? -- Werner Koch 2014-10-24 19:10:21
Additional features from wishlist
(Depends on funding and available time) more improvements from the Wishlists.