| 
  
   Size: 813 
  
  Comment:  
 | 
    ← Revision 33 as of 2016-07-21 09:36:43  ⇥ 
  Size: 3514 
  
  Comment:  
 | 
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. | 
| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| = OpenPGPEmailSummit: EmailValidation | ## page was renamed from OpenPGPEmailSummits-EmailValidation = OpenPGPEmailSummit201512: EmailValidation  | 
| Line 3: | Line 4: | 
| Workshop at [[OpenPGPEmailSummit201512|2nd OpenPGP Email Summit, Dec 2015]] run by Nicolai Josuttis | Workshop at [[OpenPGPEmailSummit201512|2nd OpenPGP Email Summit, Dec 2015]] run by Nicolai Josuttis \\ Follow-Up: [[OpenPGPEmailSummit201607/EmailValidation]] == Approach  | 
| Line 6: | Line 10: | 
| The key approach is: * Define a standard signature to signal successfull email validation * Establish some initial validation servers to perform that validations on request  | 
|
| Line 10: | Line 11: | 
| Key properties of the approach are: | This would help to **solve two major problems** we have: * People can currently easily upload faked keys (and they do) * We have a lot of "moldered" keys (old keys not for any usage anymore) The **key approach** is: * Define a **standard signature format** to signal successfull email validation ** The standard format would require to: *** let the signature expire after 1 year *** having a "signature notation" defining when/how/what was validated as JSON value *** having a link to the validation policy of the validation server ** The standard format allows email clients to process them accordingly *** E.g.: **** Prefer or highlight keys that hav any such signature **** In the UI show a list of who validated the email address **** Signal trust for a UID if it is signed by one or more (specific) validating servers ** But even existing email clients can benefit from them: *** According to the WebOfTrust a user can grant trust (and therefore priority) to emails with specific signatures * Establish some **initial validation servers** to perform that validations on request ** To validate: Sends email to email address in UID encrypted with the key to ensure that the one who confirms has the private key ** Request might be implicitly triggered by email clients or explicitly triggered by sending an email *** request shall be an email **** to ensure that the request is signed by the owner *** part of the email can be two hints: **** "upload to key server" **** "revoke signatures on old keys" ** Validation can be done asynchonously (not hindering immediate use of a new key) **Key properties of the approach** are:  | 
| Line 13: | Line 43: | 
| * Fast establishment possible when email clients (e.,g. enigmail) support this in a new version * The standard format might also be used by email providers, who provide both email address and keys (e.g. Google) * Yes, this is a CA-like approach ** Careful selection of initial CAs ** Options: Current SMime CAs, trusted organizations, ... ? * This is **no perfect solution**, but it makes faking keys a lot harder and easier to detect ** Solution against trolls not against secret services ** But very important for the acceptance of OpenPGP because the naive user does not understand, why emails are not validated **Open issues:** * How to ensure that the validation request is triggered by the owner of the key? ** To avoid spam DOS ** Answer: explicit request by email client that supports this approach or by user sending a specific email. * Who runs a first validation server? == Documents / Links / Resources  | 
|
| Line 18: | Line 68: | 
| Whiteboard 2nd OpenPGP Summit: [[attachment:Whiteboard_EmailValidation.png]] | Whiteboard 2nd OpenPGP Email Summit: [[attachment:Whiteboard_EmailValidation.png]] == Feedback Please send comments and feedback to Nico Josuttis, nico(at)enigmail.net (Fingerprint: CFEA 3B9F 9D8E B52D BD3F 7AF6 1C16 A70A F92D 28F5)  | 
OpenPGPEmailSummit201512: EmailValidation
Workshop at 2nd OpenPGP Email Summit, Dec 2015 run by Nicolai Josuttis 
 Follow-Up: OpenPGPEmailSummit201607/EmailValidation
Approach
With this approach we want to establish a quick backward compatible solution to validate email addresses of UIDs of OpenPGP keys.
This would help to solve two major problems we have:
- People can currently easily upload faked keys (and they do)
 - We have a lot of "moldered" keys (old keys not for any usage anymore)
 
The key approach is:
- Define a standard signature format to signal successfull email validation
- The standard format would require to:
- let the signature expire after 1 year
 - having a "signature notation" defining when/how/what was validated as JSON value
 - having a link to the validation policy of the validation server
 
 - The standard format allows email clients to process them accordingly
- E.g.:
- Prefer or highlight keys that hav any such signature
 - In the UI show a list of who validated the email address
 - Signal trust for a UID if it is signed by one or more (specific) validating servers
 
 
 - E.g.:
 - But even existing email clients can benefit from them:
- According to the WebOfTrust a user can grant trust (and therefore priority) to emails with specific signatures
 
 
 - The standard format would require to:
 
- Establish some initial validation servers to perform that validations on request
- To validate: Sends email to email address in UID encrypted with the key to ensure that the one who confirms has the private key
 - Request might be implicitly triggered by email clients or explicitly triggered by sending an email
- request shall be an email
- to ensure that the request is signed by the owner
 
 - part of the email can be two hints:
- "upload to key server"
 - "revoke signatures on old keys"
 
 
 - request shall be an email
 - Validation can be done asynchonously (not hindering immediate use of a new key)
 
 
Key properties of the approach are:
- No change of existing key server infrastructure or protocol
 - Existing email clients can use it
 - Fast establishment possible when email clients (e.,g. enigmail) support this in a new version
 - The standard format might also be used by email providers, who provide both email address and keys (e.g. Google)
 
- Yes, this is a CA-like approach
- Careful selection of initial CAs
 - Options: Current SMime CAs, trusted organizations, ... ?
 
 
- This is no perfect solution, but it makes faking keys a lot harder and easier to detect
- Solution against trolls not against secret services
 - But very important for the acceptance of OpenPGP because the naive user does not understand, why emails are not validated
 
 
Open issues:
- How to ensure that the validation request is triggered by the owner of the key?
- To avoid spam DOS
 - Answer: explicit request by email client that supports this approach or by user sending a specific email.
 
 
- Who runs a first validation server?
 
Documents / Links / Resources
Initial Proposal: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2015-July/053971.html
Slides: attachment:EmailValidation20151207.pdf
Whiteboard 2nd OpenPGP Email Summit: attachment:Whiteboard_EmailValidation.png
Feedback
Please send comments and feedback to Nico Josuttis, nico(at)enigmail.net (Fingerprint: CFEA 3B9F 9D8E B52D BD3F 7AF6 1C16 A70A F92D 28F5)
